arguer's Usage Examples:

motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates two positions which share similarities, one modest and easier.

is true] absolutely") is a type of informal fallacy that occurs when the arguer fails to recognize the difference between rules of thumb (soft generalizations.

challenged using a common definition of a term in the argument, and the arguer presents a different definition of the term and thereby demands different.

theater, film and television who has dabbled as a screenwriter, director and arguer film, beginning his career in the cinema's golden era.

The first of these fallacies is ad hominem which is when an arguer attacks the opposing arguer and not the actual argument.

material fallacy is an error in what the arguer is talking about, while a verbal fallacy is an error in how the arguer is talking.

a psychological element in referring to how the argument appears to the arguer.

The arguer advances the controversial position, but when challenged, they insist that.

situations but not applying it to a special situation that interests the arguer even though the general principle properly applies to that special situation.

acute) ambiguïté → ambigüité [ɑ̃biɡɥite] (ambiguity) arguer → argüer [aʁɡɥe] (to argue) A tréma is also added to a u following an e muet.

" The No true Scotsman is committed when the arguer satisfies the following conditions: not publicly retreating from the initial.

Guilt by association, that is accusing an arguer because of his alleged connection with a discredited person or group, can.

the opponent expressing it do not in fact exist, or at the very least the arguer has never encountered them.

poisoning the well fail to meet this criterion because they attack the arguer rather than the argument or use argumentative devices that divert attention.

As such Johnson argues that the arguer of an argument should not seek to "immunize" their argument from criticism.

Always a pipe in his mouth, phlegmatic, mocking, cold, an arguer.

shown how the phrase can be used as a motte-and-bailey fallacy, when an arguer starts with pro-war claims but, when challenged on the details, retreats.

First, critics respond by claiming that the arguer cannot be sure that he or she is having particular experiences.

Synonyms:

eristic; refuter; devil"s advocate; debater; confuter; rebutter; disputant; wrangler; disprover; controversialist;

Antonyms:

unargumentative;